WORLD WARS IMPORTANT QUESTIONS

 1. How far Germany was responsible for World War-II? 

 1) Germany was responsible for World War-II 

 2) It propagated aggressive nationalist bournes and supported superiority of its race. 

 3) Germany developed absolutism and opposed the ideas of capitalism and illiberalism, which created dubitation among the nations. 

 4) Germany openly rejected the convention of Versailles and attacked numerous countries to recapture its lost homes. This created political insecurity in Europe. 

 5) Germany introduced mandatory military training and raised the military budget which redounded in a race for piling up of war accoutrements in all European nations. 

 6) Hitler, the oppressor of Germany attacked Poland on 1"September 1939, this was considered as the immediate cause for the 2nd World War. 

  7) So in this way it can be concluded that Germany was substantially responsible for the World War II. 

 

 

  2. Bandy the death and destruction during two World Wars. 

 1) The two World Wars were different from other wars that the world had seen till also. 

  2) The death and destruction caused by them was unknown. 

 3) World War I had claimed 10 million men in battle. ( Therefore included about 75, 000 Indian dogfaces who fought in Africa and Europe on behalf of Britain.) 

 4) The consequences of World War II were indeed more terrible. 

 5) It redounded in about 22-25 million military casualties and the deaths of roughly 40-52 million civilians, including nearly 6 million Jews the victims of the Holocaust and the US attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan with snippet losers which killed between to people incontinently. 

 6) The after- goods of these bombings, like leukemia and cancer, dallied on for decades. 

  7) The former wars between nations may have lasted longer but those wars weren't geographically as wide nor their goods as murderous as the bones in the 20th century. 

 

 

 

 3. What do you mean by "New balance of power after World War-II"? 

 1) World War II ended the supremacy of Britain and confederated powers over the World. 

2) TheU.S.A and theU.S.S.R were surfaced as new superpowers. 

 3) Ex- colonies of western powers in Asia, Africa and Latin America were surfaced as recently independent or Third world countries. 

 4) Therefore the World was divided into three blocks ie,U.S.Ablock.,U.S.S.R block and NAM countries. 

 

 

4. Write about League of Nations (or) How do you say that the failure of League of Nations was one of the causes for the outbreak of World War-II? 

 League of Nations:

 1) The convention of Versailles set up the League of Nations to help wars in the future after World War-1 

 2) The also President ofU.S.A. Woodrow Wilson played active part for the conformation of League. 

 3) Still,U.S.A couldn't come a member as the US Congress (Parliament) refused to permission the offer of the President. 

 4) Russia or Germany wasn't invited to come members of League of Nations. 

 5) By the time 1934, the League had 58 members only. 

 6) It was hoped that it'll help exclude wars through' Collaborative Security'and settle controversies between countries through arbitration or concession. 

  7) It also setup several transnational agencies for conducting weal conditioning like health, labour weal and also an International Court of Justice for legal controversies between nations. 

 8) Indeed though it showed a lot of pledge and important was anticipated of it, it failed ultimately to help Germany and Italy from violating transnational agreements and attacking other countries. 

 9) Therefore, the failure of League of Nations was responsible for the outbreak of World War-II. 

 

 

  5.If one country takes an aggressive station against another country should the other country also respond aggressively? Can there be other ways of handling the problem? 

 1) If one country takes an aggressive station against another country, the other country shouldn't respond aggressively. 

 2) There are numerous ways to handle this problem. 

 3) There are some organisations likeU.N.O to settle these controversies peacefully. 

 4) We can call upon parties to any disagreement to settle their disagreement by concession, arbitration or other peaceful means. 

 5) We can put profitable warrants or to ramify politic relations with a state which is aggressive, poses a trouble to peace. 

 6) We can also take military action against an raider as may be necessary to maintain or restore transnational peace and security with the support of peace- loving nations. 

 7) If both the countries take aggressive station against each other, it results into a massive destruction not only in both the countries but also in their neighbouring countries.